Please adjust your browser screen for a full a view of the text and readability (simulate 8½ x 11 inch paper) . Correct the format errors in the  sample paper  below. Click the MLA Handbook numbers to link to format, content and punctuation guidelines. Check your answers with the Correction Menu. This tutorial provides a basic orientation to the principles and organization of the handbook. As additonal aides, the  uncorrected  and  corrected  texts may be dowloaded as Microsoft Word documents.

[Use the "Back / Forward" browser menu to return to your original place in the exercise]

3. 2. 7 g  |  3. 4. 1  |  3. 5. 2  |  3. 5. 5  |  3. 6. 2  |  3. 7. 2  |  4. 5  |  4. 6  |  5. 4  |  5. 6. 1  |  5. 6. 3  |  5. 6. 4  |  5. 6. 7  |  5. 6. 8  |  5. 6. 13  |  5. 6. 15  |  5. 6. 20  |  5. 6. 25  |  5. 7. 2  |  5. 7. 5  |  5. 7. 6  |  5. 8. 1  |  5. 8. 7  |  5. 8. 11  |  5. 9. 2  |  5. 9. 2 c  |  5. 9. 4 a  |  5. 9. 9 k  |  6. 2  |  6. 3  |  6. 4. 1  |  6. 4. 2  |  6. 4. 3  |  6. 4. 4  |  6. 4. 6  |  6. 4. 8  |  6. 4. 9  |  7. 2  |  7. 7. 2


Correction Menu | MLA Handbook Info






 

4. 6  1

John Jones

Grooms   4. 5

English   4. 5

7 / 7 / 08   3. 5. 5   7. 2

  4. 5


Only a small percentage of the plays (some 700)   3. 5. 2   written during the Golden

Age of Elizabethan drama (1590-1610) survive into print. (Nolan, 30)   6. 2   6. 3   6. 4. 2

Popular drama in the 1580's   3. 2. 7g   existed as no more than the street professions

of clowns and jugglers performing the occasional dramatic interlude. (Nolan, 35)   6. 2   6. 3

6. 4. 2   As with the "bohemian" and "hippie" youth movements in New York, Los Angeles

San Francisco and other American cities during the 60's   3. 2. 7g   3. 5. 5 ,   bands of

reckless young people with working-class and college educations invaded this London urban

underworld and street culture in the latter half of the sixteenth century, living mostly by their

own wits and talents. In their early careers, they wrote for local actors of street plays, much

like the early Beatles, Orbison, Nelson and Holly   3. 4. 1   wrote material for other

more popular performers in Liverpool and Nashville before they received their big break in

the business (Interview)   5. 8. 7  6. 2 .  The new lyric of age expresses a realism and candor rarely

seen in previous street ballads. William Shakespeare describes love as a steadfast and dedicated

event that endures despite all temporal hardship (619)   6. 4. 8 . Employing the vagabond actors

and performers living in the poorer back streets of London, they kindled an age of dramatic art

that blazed for one single twenty-year episode, leaving only a few names like Shakespeare etched

in the minds of the middle-class London merchants and consumers of that age (London)   6. 4. 4 .

As Elizabethan drama blazed only briefly, few intellectuals paid specific attention to

the plays during the years of their performance (Critics)   5. 9. 2 c ; the critics of the time scoffed

at them (Hall 2,126)   6. 4. 3 .   Future scholars of drama appreciated the Elizabethan era only as





4. 6  2

they were raking over the ashes of a vanished art form (Ardath, Online).   6. 4. 6   Even

Shakespeare had no candid biographer to chronicle the important details of his life.

(Shakespeare)   6. 4. 4 .   Only a few church records survive with his name spelled six or seven

different ways in a time long before a stable language and dictionaries (English)   6. 4. 4 .

Only a few rough folios of lines to his plays written down some twenty years after his death

endure beyond his epoch. Surviving stage-notes indicate that he created some characters for

the talents of specific but now nameless actors and actresses (Evans 86)   5. 6. 4   6. 2   6. 3

6. 4. 2   - "A kingdom for a stage" (Henry V, I.3)   7. 7. 2   6. 4. 8 ,  a deluge afterwards

washing away any memory of the man Shakespeare into oblivion. We trace his life and art

only through the poetry and drama attributed to him.

Since the development of modern English in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,

each generation has revered the characters created by Shakespeare, despite the constraints of

Elizabethan dramatic style and language (Shakespeare Language)   5. 9. 2    6. 4. 2 .   Over-studied and

over-simplified in many high school English classes in America, his characters pass into our

culture "to be or not be" (Hamlet, 3:25)   7. 7. 2   6. 4. 8 ,  as it were, vital to our own modern

predicament. (lecture)   5. 8. 11   6. 2 .   As the Shakespearian actress Diana Riggs once

illuminated, modern readers with ears dull to the Elizabethan tongue, accustomed to American

fast-food English and decidedly unaccustomed to Shakespeare's flowery and obsolete

speeches, fail to understand the profound spectacle of King Lear as his fate emerges before

them on the modern stage (Riggs)   5. 8. 1  6. 4. 1 .   A British critic of Shakespeare once

noted that King Lear studies the wages of personal and political power, transforming "brutal

arrogance into madness and then divine humility." (70)   6. 3 (author: Smith)   6. 4. 2    If so,

then such accounts appear no less true about Shakespeare's own artistic powers, which at the

age of 37, produced the brutal visage and behavior of Hamlet and then developed a series of

dark characters, culminating with the broken, mad character of Lear (shak-L)   6. 3 .





  4. 6  3

Following his early plays, which juxtaposed the hardened boyish wisdom of Henry V   3. 6. 2

and the fantasy of A Midsummer Night's Dream   3. 6. 2,   this enigmatic "dark period" of

Shakespeare's life saw the creation of Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth, Coriolanus and King Lear

3. 6. 2   (Geilgud)   5. 8. 1   6. 2 .   Despite the ardent claims of 19th century   3. 5. 5   Romantics

that a tragic personal experience prefaces the advance of Shakespeare's tragic power, no

substantial proof exists for this mood in his work (Barry 82)   6. 2 ;  however, a dark mood

permeates his writing in this period. As one scholar states:

The reader feels a dark strain, a far off-sound ... from dreaded histories, of great men

and women caught in an older web of Destiny, wrecked by some flaw in themselves,

or rendered helpless amid a crushing environment of evil, and swept down by terrible

non-human forces on the remorseless flood of fate (Smith 125).   3. 7. 2, (82)   6. 3 (207-8)

The setting of King Lear appears grim and dark, a world of terror and strangeness, harboring

Lear's struggle with his own nature and ending in insanity and death (Ardath, Hamlet)

6. 4. 6 .   Despite the edification of a tale from Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings

of Britain
(Thorpe, 44)   6. 4. 2 ,   the tragic character of Lear overpowers the psyche of

playwright, actors, and audience. The intense level of tragic pathos and comedy running

through the dialogue between Lear and his Fool remains unrivaled in the history of drama

(James 14, Smith 84)   6. 4. 9   6. 2 .   Scholars of drama still consider the awakening of Lear

from his madness Shakespeare's greatest dramatic achievement.





4. 6  4

Works Consulted    5. 4


Abernathy, Frances lecture Stephen F. Austin State University December 4, 1977

5. 8. 11

Ardath, Ian "Searching for Ancient Actors." Traditio 2.7 (March 1991): 13 pp.

15 Apr. 2008. http://www.traditio.com/ardath/9054/march~91.   5. 9. 4a

Ardath, Ian, Geilgud and Hamlet,  Stagecraft 15 February 1992, 46, 48-9. 110.   5. 6. 3

  5. 7. 6

Allen, Barry.  Shakespeare, Shelley and the Romantic Reaction, New York, Granada Press:
1958   5. 6. 1

Benatar, Henry. "The Profound Lessons of Lear."  Current Criticism of Shakespeare  Martin

James, ed. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1979 105-119   5. 6. 7

Cyber-Shakespeare Language Project. Ed. William Collins 2000 Cambridge Texts Archives

University of Cambridge. 28 Jan. 2003. http://www.cambu.edu/cslp   5. 9. 2

"Elizabethan London."  Folger's Encyclopedia of Shakespeare  edition 1985   5. 6. 8

Elizabethan English.  Folger's Encyclopedia of Shakespeare  edition 1985   5. 6. 8

Evans, George D., Barbara Williford.  The Shakespeare Companion  New York: Charles

Scribner's Sons, 1978   5. 6. 4

Folgeroy, Malcom. Personal Web Site. Shakepeare's Critics Page

4 June 2003.   http://www.oxon.uk.co/oxlit/folgeroy/critics.html  5. 9. 2 c

Geoffrey of Monmouth,  The History of the Kings of Britain  Lewis Thorpe, trans.,

Hammondsmith: Penguin Classics, 1966   5. 6. 13

Hall, Edward.  The History Diaries  Ed. M. Trumble in two volumes, London: Unwin,

1928   5. 6. 15


  4. 6  5

The Later Shakespeare.  John Geilgud, narrator. John Atwater, writer and producer.

BBC Thames Special. KERA, Dallas-Ft.Worth. March 25, 1981.   5. 8. 1

Logan, Paul "The Nature of Elizabethan Drama"  Shakespeare Quarterly  14,3.4, (1986)

pp.29-45   5. 7. 2

Riggs, Dianna, narr. Mute Cybelines: Shakespeare's Women.  Dir. Anthony Hale. 2 episodes.

PBS. WEBA, Boston. 26-27 Oct. 1985   5. 8. 1

Rinehart, Thomas, Dr. Personal Interview February 27, 1990   5. 8. 7

Recome, Robert. "Re: Biography: Shakespeare." 6 July 1999.

shak-L. Shaksper: The Global Electronic Conference. 27 June 1999.

http://www.arts.ubc.ca/english/iemls/shak/shak-L.html   5. 9. 9 k

Shakespeare, William. "Let me not to the marriage of true minds." Schilb, Clifford. Making

Literature Matter. Boston: Bedford St. Martin's, 2006   5. 6. 7

Smith, Logan Pearsall. "On Reading Shakespeare," February 20, 1989, New York

Times: C23   5. 7. 5

Who was Shakespeare?  Pamphlet, New York: Folger Library, ?1974    5. 6. 20   5. 6. 25